U N O MUST CHANGE ITS RULES IF IT WANTS TO ACT IN CASES OF "GENOCIDE" !!!

For more than a year the United Nations Organization (UNO) has proved that it is incapable of intervening in  Syria to stop the bloodshed by President Bashar Assad and his Government !!!

The violence of the repression of the opposition is nothing else but "GENOCIDE" by a DESPOTIC PRESIDENT !!!   UNO with its rules of the "VETO" (which China and Russia used to protect its own interests) is throttled and will never manage to do anything really worthwhile unless changes are made.

To put it very simply another way, there are "Human Rights Acts" which murderers exploit when they can, yet UNO can do nothing to stop repeated acts of "genocide" !!!

Should UNO not start now, before other cases like Syria develope, to limit the use of Vetoes ?  Should a veto not be available for every country to prevent direct UNO intervention in its own country ?  However, should UNO not reserve the right to intervene if a high majority (80% or 90%) to intervene is obtained by a vote in the General Assembly ?

Alternatively should "Acts of Genocide" not be recognised as a legitimate reason for UNO intervention ?

If UNO does not change its rules it will lose any respect it still has left after the bloodshed in Syria.  Its best politicians and ambassaders are at present comparable with toothless lions !!!                                                    

                                                                                .