TOUR DE FRANCE : DID TOM SIMPSON DIE ON MOUNT VENTOUX IN VAIN ?

Tomorrow the 100th Tour de France begins but the real question all observers are secretly asking is "What has really changed since Tom Simpson died on Mount Ventoux ?" during the 13th stage of the Tour de France on the 13th of July 1967. 

After his death everyone involved in sport and the public, wanted more strenious and strict controls in all Sports, not only in Cycling !   Has Cycling since then really changed ?  Not really !

It is history that Jacques Anquetil, five times winner of the Tour de France always refused to submit himself to anti-doping controls.  He died in 1987 from cancer at the age of 53.

Recently the record of Lance Armstrong, as a seven-time winner of the Tour de France was erased from records.  He said to win the Tour de France without doping is impossible !  Other cyclists have concurred with him.

The real question therefore becomes, "What has the Tour de France organisation changed since the death of Tom Simpson ?"  Has he died in vain ?  Just recently newspapers in France headlined the fact that Jalabert was controled "positive" 15 years ago, but this fact was only made public recently !

 

Rigorous doping tests are not made in Cycling.  Selective tests are made, but cheats can avoid them.  The crux of the matter is that sponsors of publicity would withdraw if key riders are disqualified. 

 

A really rigorous system of controls would mean disqualifying doped athletes for life from all sports as well as their trainers and managers.   To do this Cycling rules must be very clear about what "doping" covers. Such precise rules do not exist yet, even 46 years after the death of Tom Simpson !

 

                                       .

CLEMENT MERIC : LA VICTIME AURAIT PROVOQUE SON AGRESSEUR

Le 5 juin dernier, la mort de Clément Méric suite à une bagarre entre jeunes extrémistes, à la sortie d'une vente privée de vêtements, en plein Paris, avait soulevé l'indignation de nos dirigeants politiques, engendré un emballement politico médiatique, suscité diverses manifestations de partis de gauche et de syndicats, accompagnées, le 23 juin dernier, de violences et de dégradations.

 Aujourd'hui, une vidéo de surveillance de la RATP tendrait à démontrer que la victime aurait porté le premier coup... Ce qui explique l'incrimination retenue par le juge d'instruction à l'encontre de celui qui, agressé, a ensuite porté un coup mortel à Clément Méric: violences volontaires ayant entrainé la mort sans intention de la donner.

 

Cette affaire rappellera à certains l'affaire du 9 juillet 2004, dans laquelle une jeune femme avait affirmé avoir été victime d'une agression à caractère antisémite dans la ligne D du RER alors qu'elle voyageait avec son bébé. Une fièvre politico-médiatique s'en était alors suivie. Jacques Chirac parlait de "son effroi devant cet acte odieux".

Le MRAP dénonçait "avec la plus grande fermeté un insoutenable acte fasciste".

Lutte Ouvrière faisait part de son "profond dégoût" et appelait à une manifestation organisée par le Parti communiste au métro Belleville...

 

Le 13 juillet la jeune femme avouait avoir tout inventé !

DML

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMPANY ACCOUNTS AND COUNTRY ACCOUNTS

Are there any real differences between company accounts and country accounts ?  It is certain generally accepted accounting principles should be applied to set up accounts.  

The next stage is to report the results to shareholders or, in the case of National Accounts, to electors ! 

Company Directors are obliged to report formally every year at Annual General Meetings.  Company directors are fired and new ones hired if shareholders so wish.

National Accounts are "explained" continuously during   the term of Government and/or the term of the "Presidency".  This can often cover a period of 4, 5, or 6 years.  The accounting rules used stretch the imagination of "historical accounting" professionals like me ! But electors finally have their say !  They vote !  The Government then stands or falls. 

If Company Accounts are wrong, a liquidation could follow !  If National Accounts are wrong, the next elected Government will quickly realise that, what it planned to attain must be delayed.  If there is no money election promises must normally wait.

Many EUROZONE countries are facing dilemmas.  These dilemmas originate mainly from the blind defence of the "EURO" which forbids countries to withdraw from the "EURO".  A subsequent adoption of a new local currency followed by a devaluation, is totally forbidden. 

EUROZONE accounting principles are rigid but flexible at the same time. These are what one can describe as being "Political Accounting Principles" !  Alternatively they are "fexible" management principles.  There is always a "margin" to delay the finality of a EUROZONE
collapse !

This explains why the result of the German General Elections on 22, September 2013 is so nervously awaited.  What will happen afterwards ?  Will German EURO financing suddenly dry up ?

                                           .



   

WHY IS JUSTICE IN BRITAIN SO SOFT ?

Continuously one sees articles in the British Press which lament the fact that criminals are not properly punished:  too often they receive lenient custodial sentences and their string of previous convictions are never "taken into account" to make them change their ways ! 

Is the object of criminal justice no longer to protect the public by "deterring" criminals, particularly habitual offenders ?  When criminals use violence should they not expect serious punishment ? That is what the public expect !

There are always excuses.  Judges say their hands are tied by the lack of Prison Space.  Barristers plead for "another chance" for their client.  Well intentioned do-gooders (social workers) want to protect the family unit of the offender.  In the end the human rights of the criminal are considered, but not those of the victim ! 

Human Rights also exist in prison.  Television is provided and visits are accepted.  The cost of the Prison and its Services is of course paid for by the Taxpayer !

The real problem is that not one person alone is responsible for everything in the Justice System (except the Prime Minister) !  A special task force to examine, report and make suggestions, would seem to be required.

All these problems have been growing for a number of years.  It is true to say most of them exist also in France, and probably in other countries too.

                                                           .

   

 

CAMERON ROLLS OUT THE RED CARPET FOR PUTIN

Why the red carpet for Mr Putin when he visits Downing Street ?  Does Putin roll out a Blue Carpet when Cameron visits Moscow ?

.     

 

HOW WILL EUROZONE DEBTORS REPAY GERMANY AND OTHER CREDITORS ?

This is the unknown factor in the EUROZONE !  Before the General Election in Germany no one really wants to commit themselves.

The basic facts are that five countries were loaned Billions of EUROS at a time when they were financially almost insolvent !  They were obliged to reorganise their finances, slim-down costs, etc and not to withdraw from the EUROZONE, i.e. the EURO. 

Alas at the time the World, particularly Europe, was in a recession and these countries have not been able to recover ! The five countries concerned (Portugal, Ireland, Spain, Greece and Cyprus) are still in difficulties and are now burdened with enormous debts which they in fact have little hope of being able to reimburse !

The real question appears to be whether their sole way out of this financial mess is not to withdraw from the EUROZONE, readopt their former currencies and declare a devaluation.  This would slim-down internal costs (particularly salaries and pensions and Financial oblgations).  It would make their country competitive on the export markets again !

Other countries have taken such action frequently in the past, but it would destroy destroy some of the objectives of the EUROZONE.  

The real question today is, therefore, what alternative solution is available ?
                          .

HOW WILL THE "EUROZONE" COLLAPSE ?

No politician in the EU at present is prepared to discuss what could happen.  The only open secret is that nothing "should" happen before the General Elections in Germany on 22 September 2013 !

When the result of the General Elections is known, when the fate of Chancellor Angela Merkel has been determined, (but not before) the German High Court will publish its opinion on what Germany is obliged to do with respect to the financing it provides to defend the EURO !

Indirectly Germany has underwritten and directly financed many loans made to EUROZONE countries in difficulty.  The sole objective has been to protect the recognised stability of the EURO.

The real question now is, "Will Germany pursue the same policies after 22 September 2013" ?

If the reply is not a frank "YES", there will be an upheaval on Financial Markets worldwide !  There will be panic !

The next question would then be :  How will different EU countries react ?  

At the EU or EUROZONE level there will be numerous strategic meetings !  The results of these meetings will not be clear immediately, alas ! 

EUROZONE countries will be like ships in a tempest without their captain !
                                      .