What is difficult to understand, for impartial observers, is that a Grand Jury decided on the facts there was a case to be answered for attempted rape by DSK on Nafissatou Diallo, the Sofitel chambermaid. Now, more than three months later, it would seem that the NY State Prosecutor, Cyrus Vance, is going to declare that there is no case to answer because Nafissatou Diallo is not considered to be a reliable witness !!!
Does that mean the evidence of bruising, sperm and the mental collapse of Nafissatou Diallo after the agression is not acceptable ? After all the publicity given to the medical report, dropping the case seems curious. Added to this, it would seem that her character was seriously soiled years before because she apparantly lied when making her application to immigrate into the USA. Does that in fact mean that she then automatically lost all her Human Rights protection ? If this was serious, why was she not kicked out before ?
DSK is the accused in this case. He pleads "not guilty" because he says there was consentment. If this is so, it is a defence, but should that not be proved in court ? Have investigations been undertaken by the Prosecutor, Cyrus Vance, to verify that DSK is a reliable witness based on his previous conduct ? Has the Prosecutor fully taken into account why a private case for damages has been undertaken by Nafissatou Diallo ?
The whole world is watching the way American Justice is being handed out !!!
No comments:
Post a Comment