What does a country, like France or Great Britain, have to do when it is faced with crippling and increasing costs for Social payments to "those out of work", or to be more precise, to layabouts who in fact never really "want to work" again ?
Basic HUMAN RIGHTS principles impose obligations meaning that they must be "supported". Alas, lending help temporarily should also have a limit !!! Is there really a limit ? Should any "aid" not be automatically reduced month on month ?
Youngsters who have left school without any meaningful qualifications also create increasing problems: when they have no work, and no money, they turn to crime ! Not just once, but repeatedly. If they are then caught, if ever they are then judged, are they then punished in order to "deter" them from becoming habitual criminals ?
Politicians plead there are not enough prison cells available. Is that acceptable ? Or should one use "layabouts" or "habitual criminals" to build more prisons in areas where unemployment is high ?
Doing nothing solves nothing; do any politicians have other solutions ?
.
No comments:
Post a Comment