When candidates want to be elected they normally have good reasons and they must explain their ideas to voters ! If they cover all the major changes voters are yearning for, in a convincing manner, they may get enough votes to be elected !
FIFA, or to be more precise, President Blatter, does not want to organise a debate by candidates to be televised and broadcast worldwide: perhaps a television chain would do a program ?
The subjects which football fanatics want to see debated can be summarised as follows;
1) Should the Statutes of FIFA be updated to limit the number of terms a President or elected Executive can serve ?
2) The "Garcia Report" is being redacted because the "Eckert Summary" was challenged; what are the views of Candidates on this subject ? Have they had any Inside Information from the outgoing President Blatter ?
3) What are the views of candidates concerning any new rules in Football such as;
- "Sin Bin time penalties" instead of "yellow cards" (like in Ice Hockey)
- Suspension for three yellow cards !
- Limitation of the number of players in a "First Team Pool"
4) Would candidates support ideas which provide referees with more help ? Would they,
- advocate "TV replays" during matches. (like in Rugby)
- consider the possibility of two referees in matches ? (like in Ice Hockey)
The foregoing are simple ideas which could animate a debate. There are certainly many other subjects the candidates themselves would like to propose.
How can electors vote for Candidates when they have not had a chance to explain what changes they think are necessary ?
.
No comments:
Post a Comment